Welcome to Vizual Statistix! My name is Seth Kadish. I live in Portland, OR, where I work as a scientist. To learn more about me, visit my LinkedIn profile, and send an invitation to connect.
This blog is a product of my passion for data visualization. The data shown here are sourced from other websites, but all statistical operations on these data and the resulting graphics are original.
If you would like to use one of my graphics on your website or in a publication, please email me. I also take requests and am available for freelance work. Contact me if you have a suggestion for a graphic or need support on a project.
A recent study by the Pew Research Center asked people whether they viewed abortion, stem cell research, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) as either morally wrong, not a moral issue, or morally acceptable. I’ve graphed a subset of the responses – the percentages of people who answered that a certain procedure was morally wrong – by educational attainment and political ideology.
The results are not particularly surprising; each group has a gradient with IVF having the fewest who are morally opposed and abortion having the most, while stem cell research rests somewhere in the middle. What I find most interesting is the distinction between embryonic and non-embryonic stem cell research. Among political ideologies, those who lean left (liberals) are the least likely to differentiate between the two; they actually are more likely to be morally opposed to non-embryonic research, but this difference is likely within the poll’s margin of error. Less educated individuals (high school or less) also do not distinguish between embryonic and non-embryonic stem cell research; if they are morally opposed to one, they are morally opposed to the other. On the other end of the spectrum, conservatives and those with at least a college degree are the most likely to differentiate. Both groups have higher percentages morally opposed to embryonic stem cell research compared to non-embryonic.